Continuity-of-Knowledge

Electronic Seal

Electronic seals are tamper-indicating devices that detect access to a monitored item by using an electronic component that can check the seal’s integrity at any time.

Overview

Seals are tamper-indicating devices that detect access to an enclosure or other monitored items. For example, opening a container would break the seal. Electronic seals are active seals, which means they require electricity (externally or from an internal battery) to function.

In the most cases, electronic seals have a wire, whose two ends are connected to an electronic component. Signals are emitted and transmitted through the wire at certain (e.g. random) time intervals. They are recorded and digitized at the other end. This wire is threaded through the item to be sealed. The electronic component must be inside a tamper-indicating enclosure, to detect tampering.

The seals can be of electronic type, or of fiber-optic type, where light pulses are emitted and sent through the wire. In both cases, the goal is to assess the continuity. If an emitted signal is not detected at the other end, or if a signal is detected that was not emitted, the seal is assumed to be broken. A new seal designs uses screen-printed resistors on a flexible film which is applied with adhesives to the item instead of using a wire. These can be readout and provide a unique signature that would change if tampering occurred.

Many electronic seals will log information on the seal’s integrity over time, a functionality not provided by passive seals. Also, state of health information can be recorded (e.g. functional diagnostics, or remaining battery life time). Several readout options are possible, include by radio frequency or by a cable connected to a data network, enabling remote readout.

Besides offering inspectors to detect when a breach occurred, electronic seals are re-usable, while passive seals are not. The disadvantages of electronic seals are that they can be significantly more expensive, and – if operated using internal power – require manual battery replacement.

References & Links

  • D. Brochard, B. Autrusson, The New Optic Fiber Electronic Seal: FO-IRES, 44th INMM Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, 2003.
  • B. Richter, G. Neumann, S. Lange, M. Goldfarb, R. Tzolov, R. Mackowiak, K. Schoop, Design Concept of the Electronic Optical Sealing System EOSS, 43rd INMM Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2002.

Possible Sites to Employ This Technology